The Power-Crop
Sometimes the power of an image is in
isolating its most compelling feature.
With today’s 20+ megapixel cameras it is almost like you are shooting with half-a-dozen or more decade-old 4 megapixel cameras-all at once. You could make an acceptable 8×10 print from a quality 4 MP image. Heck, even for screen work it was overkill. The other thing dodeca-megapixels plus gives us is the ability to crop mercilessly or, from the artist’s point of view, mercifully.
Here is a picture taken in my studio with a 20+ megapixel camera. It would make a great large print. How large? I would push this baby to 16×24 inch without batting an eye. It is sharp, well-exposed, and taken with quality optics. It will survive enlargement quite well.
The temptation to barely crop our images is a two-headed beast born of love and necessity. On one hand it comes from our unwillingness to carve away bits of our artistic vision. We compose so carefully, check our viewfinder diligently, and expose the sensor quite deliberately. What is there was meant to be there and that’s all there is to it! This image at left is an example of a minimal crop. Not much has been shaved off the sides. Cropping was done in-camera before the shutter was snapped.
The second head of this beast is our rabid economizing of megapixels. People have told us we have to have this many or that many pixels to make this size or that size of print. We believe them. Partly, because it is true, partly because we want to preserve every photon corralled. We want-whether we need to or not-to make the biggest print possible and have it look good enough no one can tell we were deficient in megapixels. We err in saving those megapixels for no good purpose other than to fill up the print-maker’s spec.
I tell my photography and design students there are two reasons to crop. The first is the most important. You crop for content. You let the story you need to tell dictate the crop you make regardless of how unusual that crop may be. The first crop strengthens that which is strong and diminishes that which was weak about your image. The second reason you crop is to fit: Square, 5×7 etc.
In the screen capture above you can see that we took a relatively small portion of the screen in our crop. In fact it is only about 1/5 of the image measured in megapixels. I’ve printed it and it makes a dandy 8×10 image. There were more than enough megapixels left after the crop.
Is it as powerful a crop as the original image? It depends on your story and your usage. The two crops convey a different feel to the image. They certainly tell different stories. Only you know if they convey the look and feel that ultimately compels you more.
With our image captures, more and more, having room to spare, we can finally think about cropping images more radically than before. Even if your monitor is a desk-filling behemoth, you can radically crop to create an image that fills its less-that-four megapixel frame. Most of our images will never be displayed at larger than 2 MP on any screen so be aggressive with your crop. Crop for power not for packaging.
The challenge was so eloquently phrased by Bob Seger:
“Deadlines and commitments
What to leave in, what to leave out”
~ Against the Wind
It is up to you. What will you leave in? Out?
Rikk Flohr © 2010
April 2, 2010 at 10:20 am
Pixels aside, a very interesting lesson in seeing. The picture is so much more amazing cropped.
Thanks.
April 2, 2010 at 6:34 pm
Since the symbolic resonance of the physical position with the sword is more effective than the woman’s expression (which doesn’t properly display resolve or determination) I saw no point in the first crop at all.
On the other hand, the second crop makes the pose look even more like a textual illustration in the style of the old Howard Pyle books, so I liked it better than the original – where her elbows are unnaturally in balance, diminishing the kinetic energy of the pose.
(I posted about Au hasard Balthazar and commercial-art Jesus lately.)
April 3, 2010 at 9:23 am
It’s really true that cropping could make a fail photo close to perfect. I myself do it sometimes.
April 3, 2010 at 9:37 am
Thanks. I think Hamlet summed it up eloquently, “To crop, or not to crop…” or something like that. Off to explore your blog… Gloris
April 3, 2010 at 10:50 am
Cool
April 3, 2010 at 4:01 pm
Yes good and clever crop (the top close-up). Much more dramatic.
April 3, 2010 at 5:34 pm
[...] The Power-Crop « Fleeting Glimpse Images Weblog [...]
April 3, 2010 at 6:17 pm
hmm this was really interesting!
April 4, 2010 at 7:24 am
interesting lesson here. really intriguing. well thanks for sharing(:
http://www.artsyfutsy.wordpress.com for entertainment news thanks(:
April 4, 2010 at 4:57 pm
There is no doubt that the cut can show better expressions of women and gives greater intensity to the image. Cut when necessary to give more power to the image is not bad. However, I consider to be cultivated from the smooth cutting framing in the camera.
April 4, 2010 at 6:17 pm
It’s funny, when I saw the picture, I first almost thought it was a scene from “Kill Bill”
April 4, 2010 at 9:48 pm
It is amazing how a creative crop can create an entirely new focal point for an image.
April 5, 2010 at 1:50 am
Very interesting post. I think my own photos will be improve after taking your advice.
April 5, 2010 at 5:49 am
I didn’t know someone could get so philosophical about cropping. Insightful and will make me think about how I use my digital photos. Thanks!
April 5, 2010 at 12:34 pm
hmm… interesting…
April 27, 2010 at 1:13 pm
Thanks for the advice!